Tuesday, April 16, 2013

M&A: An option or a compulsion for MRF?

Blame it on the rising raw material cost or the inverted duty structure, MRF is now exploring opportunities for acquiring companies outside the country, all to protect shrinking margins and remain profitable. But, is it really the right strategy?

Although MRF, India’s largest tyre manufacturer, entered the business much earlier than most of its competitors, it chose not to invest any money in building plants or acquiring companies abroad. Instead, it has focussed on building its brand in international markets. But not anymore. Blame it on the rising raw material cost or the inverted duty structure, MRF is now exploring opportunities for acquiring companies (as well as rubber plantations) outside the country, all to protect shrinking margins and remain profitable.

While the company is yet to announce full results for the year ended September 30, 2011, Arun Mammen, the Managing Director of MRF took a lot of pride in announcing (at a press meet in Chennai recently) that the company’s turnover has crossed Rs.100 billion mark in FY2010-2011 (the first Indian tyre manufacturer to do so in any financial year) at a growth rate of about 30 % over the previous year on the back of buoyant demand. Though the topline has not posed a serious problem for MRF (the topline of the company has doubled from Rs.50 billion in 2007) so far, the bottomline has taken a dip due to high raw material costs. MRF reported a net profit of Rs.2.2 billion for the nine month ending June 30, 2011 against a net profit of Rs. 2.7 billion during the corresponding period last year, a decline of 19.08%. And not just MRF; in fact, the tyre manufacturing industry, as a whole, has been operating at a margin of 1-1.5% for the last one year or so.

The reason is simple. The rubber prices have gone up from Rs.140 a kg to Rs.235 in the domestic market over the last one year. Although prices have plateaued now, they are still high for an industry that is marred with an inverted duty structure – a scenario where it costs more to import rubber (20% import duty) than importing a brand new tyre by paying just 7% import duty.

Further, the removal of anti-dumping duty by the government on truck and bus radials (TBRs) imported from China and Thailand from August 2011 onwards has only made the situation worse for tyre manufacturers, including MRF, in India. The move is expected to make imported tyres not only cheaper by almost 15-20%, but will also limit the pricing power of domestic players in replacement TBR market thereby further impacting their margins.

Notwithstanding the concerns of relatively lower distribution reach and inconsistency in quality of the imported tyres, the attractive price point is expected to pose a serious threat to domestic tyre manufacturers particularly in the replacement segment where MRF happens to be one of the dominant players, placing large Chinese tyre manufacturers like Giti Tire Company Ltd. and, Weifang City Gunaite Rubber Co. Ltd. in direct competition with it. “It was said that the imports of rubber is being discouraged because of the larger interest of the domestic rubber growing community. But one cannot understand that if this was the intention why there has been a rise in the imports of finished tyres from other countries, how is it going to help the domestic industry?” questions Rajiv Budhiraja, Director General, Automotive Tyre Manufacturers’ Association.
 

Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
 
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
 
2012 : DNA National B-School Survey 2012
Ranked 1st in International Exposure (ahead of all the IIMs)
Ranked 6th Overall

Zee Business Best B-School Survey 2012
Prof. Arindam Chaudhuri’s Session at IMA Indore
IIPM IN FINANCIAL TIMES, UK. FEATURE OF THE WEEK
IIPM strong hold on Placement : 10000 Students Placed in last 5 year
IIPM’s Management Consulting Arm-Planman Consulting
Professor Arindam Chaudhuri – A Man For The Society….
IIPM: Indian Institute of Planning and Management
IIPM makes business education truly global
Management Guru Arindam Chaudhuri
Rajita Chaudhuri-The New Age Woman
IIPM B-School Facebook Page
IIPM Global Exposure
IIPM Best B School India
IIPM B-School Detail

IIPM Links
IIPM : The B-School with a Human Face

Is this perch a wobbly one?

From an OEM to a technology brand, Samsung’s journey to global fame and fortune has been a terrific case study in recent years. But could it be its own worst enemy?

The word Samsung means ‘three stars’ – or a business that will be huge and eternal. It looks quite apt today when you consider how the company has grown from strength to strength and is credibly challenging the biggies like Sony and Apple in their own spaces.It’s the 17th most valuable brand of today as per Interbrand, larger than even American Express, Nike and Pepsi. A Samsung top official declared in 2005 that the company’s intent was to be valued like a BMW. That approach seems to have worked wonders for its transition from an OEM to one of the hottest technology brands in the world of today.

Samsung Electronics recently made news when it overtook Apple in smartphone shipments for the third quarter as per IDC data. With shipments of 23.6 million, it has a major lead in the market with a share of 20% as compared to Apple (14.5%) and Nokia (14.2%). But in a technology world where heroes are built and vanquished in fairly short spans of time, and market advantages come and go fairly quickly, can Samsung prove true to the ‘eternal’ aspect of its vision?

When you compare Samsung to LG in a market like India, the difference looks glaringly huge, more so because Samsung has placed its bets right. Samsung India has beaten LGEIL to become a bigger player in the Rs.1.1 trillion consumer electronics (as per retail advisory firm Technopak) and mobile handsets market, thanks to its booming mobile handset business. Considering that the Rs.750 billion mobile handset market is more than twice the size of all consumer electronics and appliances put together (roughly Rs.350 billion), it doesn’t look like LG can browbeat Samsung anytime soon. Samsung has strategically brought in innovative and timely mobility products (especially since Galaxy was launched) where replacement cycles are faster, typically a year, compared to a segment like refrigerators or TVs, where it can be anywhere from 5-10 years. Almost 50% of Samsung’s revenues are coming from the mobility segment, which is also the fastest growing. It’s already the largest tablet and smartphone maker in India, and aims to achieve 40% of the market by the end of 2011. It achieved net sales of Rs.116.63 billion and net profit of Rs.4.02 billion for the year ended March 2010, against LG India’s Rs.106.91 billion in net sales and Rs.3.47 billion in net profit, as per data with Registrar of Companies (RoC). Samsung’s sales projection for 2011 shows a revenue of Rs.224 billion, a growth of 40% yoy. By 2013, Samsung India hopes to touch around Rs.460 billion and become a $10 billion company by 2014.

Whether Samsung will be able to sustain its leadership in India will also depend on how it sustains its leadership in the smartphone and tablet spaces globally. Though Apple is its biggest competitor, Samsung also shares a symbiotic relation with the former. Since Apple doesn’t make the iPhone itself, it depends on various suppliers, and Samsung provides some of iPhone’s most important components: the flash memory for apps, music and operating software; the working memory or DRAM and the applications processor, which account for 26% of the component cost of an iPhone. Samsung thrives on this business model; acting as a supplier of components for others gives it the scale to produce its own products cheaply. But if the Nokia-Microsoft combine can make a mark (considering the stakes for both, they are expected to be extremely aggressive with product launches) and if Apple starts getting more aggressive in third world markets, Samsung may find its leadership tougher to sustain. The threat will also be significant as the Apple-Samsung war intensifies in the IP arena. Samsung was recently stopped from selling the Galaxy Tab 10.1 in Australia. The two are in the midst of around two dozen patent wars in 10 countries.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
 
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
 
2012 : DNA National B-School Survey 2012
Ranked 1st in International Exposure (ahead of all the IIMs)
Ranked 6th Overall

Zee Business Best B-School Survey 2012
Prof. Arindam Chaudhuri’s Session at IMA Indore
IIPM IN FINANCIAL TIMES, UK. FEATURE OF THE WEEK
IIPM strong hold on Placement : 10000 Students Placed in last 5 year
IIPM’s Management Consulting Arm-Planman Consulting
Professor Arindam Chaudhuri – A Man For The Society….
IIPM: Indian Institute of Planning and Management
IIPM makes business education truly global
Management Guru Arindam Chaudhuri
Rajita Chaudhuri-The New Age Woman
IIPM B-School Facebook Page
IIPM Global Exposure
IIPM Best B School India
IIPM B-School Detail

IIPM Links
IIPM : The B-School with a Human Face